Pinkerton Agent Abigail MacKay’s willful sister, Madeleine, is going to
be the death of her yet. That is, if Madeleine doesn’t get herself killed
first! After running off to marry a widower whose wives mysteriously
die—leaving behind a great deal of money each time—spoiled, beautiful Madeleine
is unaware of the danger she’s in. Though no doctor has been able to establish
a cause of death for any of the women, Abigail is sure they were murdered—and
that her younger sister is going to be next. The only person who can help her
save Maddie is the charismatic criminal, Nat Quinn—and Abi left him cooling his
heels in jail at their last meeting.
As Fate would have it, Nat and his partner, Jake Conroy, were the last
to see Madeleine before she disappeared. She happened to be on a train The
Innocents held up—but she was alive and well when they parted ways. And
Madeleine is the least of Nat’s worries, now that he’s discovered that Abigail
has lied to him about one very important thing—she’s married!
When Abi risks all to ride into the outlaws’ deadly hideout and ask for
help, there’s no doubt she’ll get it—but nothing’s free in Ghost Canyon; here,
everything has a price. With a new understanding in their relationship, Nat
agrees to help her prove David Bartholemew is a cold-blooded killer before he
can murder Maddie.
With Jake in charge of Madeleine’s welfare, all hell breaks loose when
two competing reporters get involved in the case, along with an old nemesis of
Nat’s coming into the mix. One thing is certain: David Bartholemew is a
murderer. But how is he doing it? In a race against time, will Nat and Abi be
able to figure it out before Jake runs out of ways to protect Maddie from her
evil husband? Or will each of them become an INNOCENT BYSTANDER?
Excerpt
A vacant-looking man with prominent yellow teeth walked into her field
of vision, striding beyond the blinding sun and dragged her roughly from the
horse. She had expected to be searched and had ruthlessly bound her body with
bandages to try to flatten and conceal her breasts, but the man merely patted
down her sides before turning his attentions to her jacket. He pulled out the
pistol which had been loosely placed in her pocket and slapped his way down her
legs. She was instantly glad she had foregone
the Derringer she usually wore at her ankle. A concealed weapon was
too risky.
“He’s clean.”
“Well, boy. It seems like you’re gonna get your wish, but if you’ve been
messin’ with us and you ain’t Quinn’s kin, you’re gonna regret it. He don’t
like to be messed with.”
Abigail felt her arms grabbed as she was roughly turned around and her
carefully dirtied hands were bound behind her back, the rope biting deeply into
her skin as it was pulled tight. They must have seen her wince as it provoked a
chorus of laughter which rang in her ears.
“Looks like this life’s a bit too rough for you, sonny.”
A thick, smelly bag was thrust over her head, obliterating the
world, before she was lifted back onto her little colt and she felt herself led
off to face the rest of the gang.
The Innocents - mybook.to/TheInnocents
Innocent
as Sin - mybook.to/InnocentasSin
Innocent
Bystander - mybook.to/Innocentbystander
Meet C.A. Asbrey
Chris Asbrey has lived
and worked all over the world in the Police Service, Civil Service, and private
industry, working for the safety and security of the public. A life-changing
injury meant a change of course into contract law and consumer protection for a
department attached to the Home Office.
In that role, she
produced magazine and newspaper articles based on consumer law and wrote guides
for the Consumer Direct Website. She was Media Trained, by The Rank
Organization, and acted as a consultant to the BBC's One Show and Watchdog. She
has also been interviewed on BBC radio answering questions on consumer law to
the public.
She lives with her
husband and two daft cats in Northamptonshire, England - for now. She’s moving
to York.
Blog - C.A Asbrey - all things obscure and strange in the Victorian period http://caasbrey.com/
The Innocents Mystery Series Group https://www.facebook.com/ groups/937572179738970/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/ mysteryscrivener/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/CAASBREY
Q&A
How
did you come up with the idea for your book?
Once upon a time, a very
long time ago, and in a land far, far away, I joined the police. Our training
sergeant was an engaging lady of great experience, full of tales, anecdotes,
and quite an expert on the earliest women in our force. I loved her, and was
quickly fascinated by all her funny tales and anecdotes. It got me wondering
about the earliest women in law enforcement. I soon found myself reading more
and more about these unsung pioneers. The USA and the UK both employed police
women since the early twentieth century, but I wanted to go as far back as I
could. I eventually found out that the Pinkerton Detective Agency in the USA
was the first to employ women as fully-fledged professionals from 1856. The
French did employ women in the Sûreté earlier than this, but they were mostly
prostitutes used as honey traps, so I discounted those as professional
detectives.
I was slightly shocked
that I had never heard of these women, or the work they did, so I read
everything I could about them. The first was Kate Warne, rumored to be a former
actress and a widow. Like the rest of the women in her department she was an
expert at assuming roles and working undercover. The women were held in the
highest esteem by Alan Pinkerton due to their excellent results. They were very
successful, and even acted as an armed guard for Abraham Lincoln. I’m Scottish.
Alan Pinkerton was a Scottish immigrant, so I couldn’t see any reason why a
female immigrant couldn’t work for him. They say you should write what you
know, and I do know about being a Scot in a foreign country. The seeds for my
heroine, Abigail MacKay, were sown. I also think it gave the mysteries a
different backdrop, as they give a view of nineteenth century USA through
the eyes of a female outsider. They start in the West, but actually go all over
the USA, Canada, and even to Scotland, as the series progresses. As a Scot, I
give my heroine genuine Scottish speech patterns, which means she’ll often use
more passive tenses, verb nouns and, a syntax which leaks over from her Gaelic.
What
could we find in your heroine's purse?
If she carries one it’d
be anything to compliment whatever disguise she is in at the time. She wears a
Derringer at her ankle and a tiny magnifying glass on a chain around her neck.
When she travels she has an enormous trunk which not only contains her clothes,
but a full kit of disguises, wigs, make up, a magnifying glass and chemicals
she needs to process clues. She uses things like hydrogen peroxide and guaiac
resin to detect blood stains, and uses early chemistry to process things. In
the nineteenth century there was no sending stuff off to the lab. They had
to either do it themselves, or find a friendly doctor or pharmacist to process
it for them.
I did loads of research
into the make up to get I right. In the only known picture of Kate Warne she’s
dressed as a man. It made me wonder if all that long Victorian hair could go
under a wing. Cosplay and LARP gave me real-life examples of women with hair
down to their bottoms who managed to get it under a short wig. One woman even
explains on YouTube how to pleat her long, thick hair and coil it flat under
the cap before putting the short wig on. It absolutely IS possible.
The theatrical make up,
used as disguises in the book, began to flourish right around the period the
books are set in. Lighting had improved and people could see the flaws in the
rudimentary makeup used previously on stages lit by candles.
Greasepaint was invented
in the 1860s by Ludwig Leichner, building on the work of Karl Freidrich Baudius
(1796–1860) in the 1850s. Lighting also improved costumes and acting
techniques. It drove a desire for more natural representations in every area,
simply because people could see the stage more clearly. Crepe hair went out and
quality wigs came in. Colors were mixed to mimic skin tones and classes in
their application were popular in the acting profession. Latex wasn’t invented
until 1920, but prior to that rubber was molded applied to a light fabric
backing for theatrical use, or on metal for medical prosthetics. When it was
the right shape it was expertly painted to look exactly like a nose, dewlap,
bald cap, or any other body part. This work influenced the work on prosthetics
for the disfigured and disabled, and became more mainstream after the First
World War. Before then it was only available to the very rich.
Which
already filmed movie represents your writing style?
It’s been compared to
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid meets Outlander in reviews. Also to The
Murdoch Mysteries meets Doctor Quinn. The books are murder mysteries which have
a tinge of humor, as well as romance, and look at the proper investigative
protocols which were in their infancy in the 1860s. Each book can be read as a
standalone murder mystery, but they are connected by the will-they-won’t-they
romance between the two main protagonists, and the murderous vendetta of the
hero’s arch-enemy. As far as I know I’m the first person to write a historical
female detective who has actually worked in law enforcement.
What
drew you to write in the genre(s) you do?
I’ve long loved
historical romances, but my favorite ones are those where true love definitely
does not run smoothly. Books like Jane
Eyre, Pride and Prejudice, or anything by Georgette Heyer were always on my
reading list. Stories which gave the heroine a touch of adventure also did it
for me, so classics like Jamaica Inn, Out of Africa, and even Miss Marple were
always on my to-read list. It struck me
that by placing my protagonists on different sides of the law gave them huge
hurdles to overcome. It gave them even more if she was the one sent to bring
him in. I tried to make them fascinated by one another’s minds as well as their
bodies. They both love all the new sciences, but she uses them to solve crimes,
where he uses them to commit them. As two sides of the same coin they are drawn
to one another, but the attraction is very dangerous for both of them. The
characters’ backstories drip out over the series, allowing the reader to find
out how the characters ended up on different sides of the law, and what drives
them. All the history is the book is minutely researched, and everything either
happened, or is historically possible.
I’ve always loved a good
murder mystery too. I started reading Agatha Christie and Dorothy L. Sayers
when I was about nine and consumed them voraciously. There is a structure to
murder mysteries which almost makes them like a game the writer plays with the
reader. You have to play by the rules and not have the detective stumble into
clues they don’t share. The reader really has to be able to solve the murder
too, but not too easily. One of the reasons I love them in books is that when
dramatized, it’s too easy to spot the killer. It’s usually the well-known actor
playing a relatively small part in the first half of the drama. I totally
ruined whodunits on TV for my neighbor by sharing that formula with her. That
never happens in a book.
Who’s
your favorite villain?
I love a good baddie,
and think that they should be as three dimensional as any hero. Their
motivations, weaknesses, strengths, and humanity should be apparent. The best
baddies aren’t obvious. They look just like anyone else, which is why they are
so hard to find. Of course there are the obvious violent thugs, but they don’t
make for wonderful villains. The best walk among us unnoticed and treat people
like prey.
I think my favorite
baddie of all time has to be Mrs. Danvers in Rebecca. She’s a glorious mix of
love and hate, loyalty and revenge, jealousy and pride. She really is quite
delicious. Hannibal Lecter, from Thomas Harris’ Red Dragon has to be up there
too. He’s highly intelligent and a typical psychopath, and really keeps us on
edge. Annie Wilkes in Misery is an archetypical fanatic with an empty heart and
an empty life. She is cunning brutal and devious, but manages to hide her true
self just enough to entrap her victims. All the best villains manage to fool
the unwary.
I love a clever
antihero. The make for a good mystery as they keep the detective on their toes,
and make it hard to keep up with them. Book three of my series, Innocent
Bystander, has exactly such a villain. That book is a howdunit, in which the
killer is identified early on, but you don’t know how he does it. His wives
have just been found dead in their beds with no trace of injury or poison. He’s a scientist and keeps Nat and Abi on
their toes as they scramble to keep up with his expertise.
Can
you tell us about a real-life hero you’ve met?
I’ve met quite a few in
my career. There have been accidental heroes, those who happen on an incident
and act immediately. I think my favorite of those has to be a handbag-wielding
granny who saw off a gang of robbers all on her own. It never crossed her mind
to do anything other than fight back. There were men at that incident who hid,
but not her. The truth is that people never know who they really are, or how
they will react until they are in the midst of things.
I’ve also met counter
intelligence operatives and trained with the SAS on counter terrorist and
anti-hijack operations. The main thing which strikes me about the men, and women,
who work in these fields, is their sense of humor. Far too often heroes are
written as deadpan and laconic. While they can be, they will still be very
funny people too. I try to capture that humor in my heroes. Speaking purely for
myself, the ability to make me laugh is a huge turn-on.
What’s
your favorite kind of story to get lost in?
One that ticks lots of
boxes at the same time. In my life, romance happened when I was busy doing
other things, so that’s how I write it. If it’s historical it has to be accurate, as
anachronisms jolt me out of a story. I love wonderful mixture of adventure,
history, storytelling, and romance. I
love stories with strong women in them, as those are the women I know, worked
with, and who brought me up. I want a hero who is humane, funny and brave. I
don’t want people to just jump into bed together. I hope the romance to build
up in a complex web of wants and desires, but to give them obstacles and
barriers which seem insurmountable, but which work out through their sheer
determination to be together. Finally, I crave stories which take me somewhere
different, and which give me a fresh perspective on things I thought I already
knew.
Goody alert! We'll have a drawing for two books, the first in the series, The Innocents, and the third book, Innocent Bystander. To enter the drawing leave a comment along with your email address.
What is your favorite era for mysteries, and why?
Oh, my goodness, I can't even begin to say how much I love this series! And Christine, you turned me into a mystery reader when I wasn't one before! YES! YOU DID IT! LOL Your research shines through in every one of your stories, and oh, the chemistry amongst the characters is just fabulous. Can't say enough good about this series of stories. They are wonderful. I'm looking forward to more, more, more!
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for supporting my work, Cheryl
DeleteWow I think this sounds just right up my alley that and that author! Congrat on this book C.C. and thank you for visiting GLIAS. Peggy Clayton ptclayton2@aol.com
ReplyDeleteThank you, Peggy. There are three out already, and three more on the way.
DeleteI've always loved mysteries, starting with The Bobbsy Twins and up through Judy Bolton, Nancy Drew and the Dana Sisters. Then I discovered Perry Mason and my love of mysteries/detective stories was sealed.Therefore, I'm fascinated by your real-life experiences that are goldmines of research for your mysteries, Christine. I love the concept of your series--one falls in love with a character(s) and doesn't want to story to end, hence lots of revisits in subsequent stories. Love it.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much, Elizabeth. That means so much coming from you.
DeleteCongratulations on your new release, Innocent Bystander, and its magnificent cover, C.A. I love to read mysteries and watch them, too--like Grantchester on BBC and my all time favorite to read, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, but I would not venture to try to write one. That takes a talent I just don't have.
ReplyDeleteGreat interview. I liked your answer about villains and how you like the good-bad villain. Maybe most of us like those villains that seem like they have a chance to turn good.
I want to wish you great success with your release. All good things to your corner of the universe, C.A.
Thank you so much, Sarah. Oh, yes. The best villains seem human. That's how they trap us.
Deleteany
ReplyDeleteC.A., I don't usually read many mysteries, but I enjoyed the first two Innocent books very much and am sure to love the third as well. I stick to writing historical romance--maybe having an element of suspence or mystery, but not really a mystery. You seem to do it with such ease as well as skill. Wishing you much success with this third one. For years I've loved reading and now writing historical romances and know just how much research they take and you have definitely found your niche.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much. That is so special coming from someone whose work I respect so much.
ReplyDeleteWhoa! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a totally different subject but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Excellent choice of colors!
ReplyDeleteI have the first three in paperback. I've enjoyed reading this series, and look forward to the following books, as much as any I've read. The story becomes extremely winding with plot and characters yet still comes off as an easy and engaging read. This is one for a free day to read without interruption. You will get drawn in and have trouble putting down. I believe with this series of books we are watching a rising star author we will see much more of in the future.
ReplyDelete